Paprika
Jackass of the Week
Er hat nur Ante in seine Schranken gewiesen und ihm klar gemacht , dass es nicht korrekt ist einen Befehlshaber von Milizen in Schutz zu nehmen , obwohl diese Schlächter auch für einen Genozid verantwortlich sind.
-
Herzlich Willkommen im Balkanforum
Sind Sie neu hier? Dann werden Sie Mitglied in unserer Community.
Bitte hier registrieren
Er hat nur Ante in seine Schranken gewiesen und ihm klar gemacht , dass es nicht korrekt ist einen Befehlshaber von Milizen in Schutz zu nehmen , obwohl diese Schlächter auch für einen Genozid verantwortlich sind.
J
Jovan
Guest
"Schranken" ich diskutiere mit ihn wie es Zivilisierte Jugoslawen tun 
Welche Miliz und was für ein Genozid?
Paprika
Jackass of the Week
Da haben wir es wieder. Am relativieren und leugnen wo es nur geht!
Das du dich nicht schämst.
Hier! Ein Stück Wahrheit für dich.
G
Gast829627
Guest
die luftschläge haben die vrs nicht im geringsten beeindruckt ...........aber schwatz dich ma zum papst gino vielleicht klappts ja mit dem fame im forum dann ..als centik warste ne lachnummer
J
Jovan
Guest
Klar
Ich schwör wie kann man diesen Kerl hassen, der ist Lustiger als Oliver Pocher
Ich schwör wie kann man diesen Kerl hassen, der ist Lustiger als Oliver Pocher
I
Indianer
Guest
wenn ich es im nach hinein betrachte, war es ein fehler überhaupt sich da einzumischen.
ohne Einmischung würde es solche drecks threads garnicht geben.
wie wie wäre es mit einem thread, welches Unheil durch die Einmischung verhindert wurde.
aber dazu seid ihr zu feige.
ohne Einmischung würde es solche drecks threads garnicht geben.
wie wie wäre es mit einem thread, welches Unheil durch die Einmischung verhindert wurde.
aber dazu seid ihr zu feige.
G
Gast829627
Guest
Sokrates
Spitzen-Poster
Hier zeigt Paprika sein wahres Gesicht. Ich hatte es irgendwie richtig in Erinnerung, nur fange ich mit dem Krieg wenig an. Vor meiner Zeit.Ok. und hat es eventuell etwas damit zu tun, dass er sich dem Diktat der USA und später auch dem Diktat der europäischen Länder nicht beugen wollte? Und war er allein und wirklich dieser YU-Superman oder waren da dann doch noch en paar andere Jugos?
- - - Aktualisiert - - -
"On Clinton's. Clinton said, 'America will enter on your, Muslim side in the war, we will bomb the Serbs if you allow the Chetniks to enter Srebrenica. And there must be no less than 5,000 massacred," said Plavsic.
She claims that Clinton told this to wartime Muslim leader in Bosnia and member of the Presidency of Bosnia-Herzegovina Alija Izetbegovic.
http://www.b92.net/eng/news/region.php?yyyy=2016&mm=03&dd=25&nav_id=97479
- - - Aktualisiert - - -
In the wake of the July 1995 fall of the Srebrenica enclave, thousands of Muslim soldiers and draft eligible men were killed or went missing. Some were captured and summarily executed by Bosnian-Serb forces, and others died in combat.
Western governments, news media, and the U.N. War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague have assiduously misled the public about the nature of the massacre, at the same time they have remained conspicuously silent about the role U.N. officials and the Muslim regime in Sarajevo played in orchestrating the massacre.
Srebrenica’s Fall Could Have Been Prevented
Yasushi Akashi, who at the time was the special envoy of the U.N. Secretary General in the former Yugoslavia, said the U.N. had “limited capabilities” and could not prevent the fall of Srebrenica. He told the Associated Press, “There was a hundred of U.N. troops versus thousands of Serb troops. What could we have done?”[1]
According to the Dutch battalion of U.N. peacekeepers who were deployed in Srebrenica, quite a bit could have been done. They were authorized to call in air strikes if the enclave was attacked, and when it was attacked they did indeed call in air strikes, but they were blocked by the U.N. until it was too late.
According to the debriefing of Dutch Battalion personnel, “The battalion was counting on massive air support … air support was requested around 10.30 hrs. [on July 11, 1995] Then, despite all of its promises, the U.N. still failed to release air power.”
The Dutch Battalion’s report states that, “Both the battalion staff and the rest of Dutchbat are convinced that the fall of the enclave can be attributed to a distinct lack of support from the air; the limited close air support did not arrive until the battle was actually over.”[2]
Even without the U.N.’s help, Bosnian-Muslim president Alija Izetbegovic’s regime could have intervened to stop the fall of the enclave and subsequent massacre, but they chose not to act either.
Then US president Clinton, late Izetbegovic deeply involved in Srebrenica case
Sefer Halilovic was the commanding officer of the Army of Bosnia-Herzegovina during the war. He was the most senior officer in Izetbegovic’s military and he testified under oath at the UN war crimes Tribunal in The Hague that “the command of the 2nd Corps and the General Staff knew when the operation on Srebrenica started, but from a series of testimonies, the people who were in Srebrenica, both from military and political structures, we can clearly see that they asked for help, both of the command of the 2nd Corps and the command of the General Staff and President Izetbegovic, but that they did not receive that assistance. To answer your question whether they had the power and materiel to help, to come to the help of Srebrenica, I think that they did.”[3]
Even though Srebrenica was abandoned by its supposed protectors at the U.N. and by its own government in Sarajevo, the Muslim forces based in Srebrenica should have been able to defend the enclave themselves. Instead, on July 12, 1995, they fled the enclave with the rest of the able-bodied men and abandoned Srebrenica’s women, children, and elderly to the mercy of the attacking Bosnian-Serb forces.
Although UN Military Observers (UNMOs) were uncertain of the exact number of Muslim military personnel in Srebrenica, they believed “that at least half had side arms as well as heavy machine guns, light mortars, and anti-tank weapons including rocket propelled grenades and more modern ones.”[4]
The Command of the 2nd Corps of the Army of Bosnia Herzegovina (ABiH) prepared a report detailing the operation Srebrenica’s men undertook to flee Srebrenica across Bosnian-Serb territory to Tuzla. Their report said, “Numbers were not established when the column was formed, but some estimates put the number in the column at 10,000 to 15,000 people, including approximately 6,000 armed soldiers, not counting soldiers from Zepa.”[5]
According to UN Military Observers, at the time of the attack the Bosnian-Serb Army’s “Drina Corps was known to be stretched in terms of resources” and the strength of the Bosnian-Serb units surrounding Srebrenica was “1,000 to 3,000 infantry with up to 20 tanks as well as artillery and multiple launch rocket systems.” When Srebrenica fell, the UNMOs estimated that the local Bosnian-Serb brigades “probably have around 1,500 infantry in total” and together with reinforcements from units stationed in adjacent areas, the total strength of the Bosnian-Serb forces around Srebrenica was “probably no less than 2,000 infantry.”[6]
Even if they hadn’t been abandoned by the UN and by their own government, 6,000 armed Muslim soldiers should have been able to fight off 1,000 to 3,000 Serb infantry men.
When the Bosnian-Serbs attacked the enclave, UN Military Observers were stunned that the Muslim army didn’t attempt to defend it. In their report they state: “The ABiH had the force ratios to defend the enclave particularly considering its hilly, wooded nature.” They went on to write, “The advantages militarily seem to have been with the [Muslim] defenders to at least hold out for longer and have inflicted greater losses on the Bosnian-Serb Army than believed. However, the ABiH leadership seems to have actually acted against their own interests to carryout a successful defense.” [7]
” Bernard Henry Levy foughttoclean Izetbegovic’s image of Islamofascist with all his energy.” – BHL earned his Sarajevo honorary Citizen status by campaigning for Islamofasists in Bosnia.
Dutch Battalion personnel in Srebrenica were surprised when Muslim troops in the enclave did not avail themselves of the weapons they were offered. On the morning of July 6[SUP]th[/SUP] 1995 battalion personnel “Informed the Bosnian government forces that, if the Bosnian-Serb Army crossed the enclave boundary, the arms in the weapon collection point in Srebrenica would be released. Later, when this situation did indeed occur, the Bosnian government forces did not avail themselves of this opportunity.”[8]
Foreknowledge of the Massacre
Izetbegovic’s decision to refuse Srebrenica’s pleas for help and to abandon it is all the more shocking in light of the fact that his regime knew what would happen if Srebrenica fell. They were fully aware of what was at stake. Two years before the massacre, Bosnian vice-premiere Zlatko Lagumdjija told reporters from the London Times that “We shall be witnesses of a big massacre if Srebrenica falls.”[9]
For the crimes committed in Srebrenica Izetbegovic and Bill Clinton are directly responsible” – “Srebrenica genocide is an agreed arrangement between the international community and Alija Izetbegovic ; between Izetbegovic and then- USA president Bill Clinton . And as for me, their agreement is much greater crime than all what happened in July 1995. The moment Bil Clinton stepped into the Srebrenica Memorial was the moment when the villain returned to the crime scene, – Ibran Mustafic,a founding member of Alija Izetbegovic’s political party, member of the Bosnian parliament, and resident of Srebrenica in his memoir book Planirani haos ( ‘The Planned Chaos’)
The U.N. also had foreknowledge of what would happen. The U.N. chose not to act in 1995 even though it knew as far back as 1993 what kind of massacre would ensue if Srebrenica fell.
Testifying at the UN War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague, the former commander of the UN Protection Force in Bosnia, French General Philippe Morillon told the court that “Naser Oric [the commander of the Bosnian-Muslim military forces in Srebrenica] engaged in attacks during Orthodox [Christian] holidays and destroyed villages, massacring all the inhabitants. This created a degree of hatred that was quite extraordinary in the region.”
He said, “Naser Oric was a warlord who reigned by terror in his area and over the population itself. I think that he realized that those were the rules of this horrific war, that he could not allow himself to take prisoners. According to my recollection, he didn’t even look for an excuse. It was simply a statement: One can’t be bothered with prisoners.”
Morillon testified, “I wasn’t surprised when the Serbs took me to a village to show me the evacuation of the bodies of the inhabitants that had been thrown into a hole, a village close to Bratunac. And this made me understand the degree to which this infernal situation of blood and vengeance led to a situation when I personally feared that the worst would happen if the Serbs of Bosnia managed to enter the enclaves and Srebrenica.” He said, “I saw, a degree of absolute misery with a real risk of tens of thousands being killed.
“I feared that the Serbs, the local Serbs, the Serbs of Bratunac, these militiamen, they wanted to take their revenge for everything that they attributed to Naser Oric. It wasn’t just Naser Oric that they wanted to revenge, take their revenge on, they wanted to revenge their dead on Orthodox Christmas. They were in this hellish circle of revenge. Not only the men. The women, the entire population was imbued with this.”
After listening to his testimony the Presiding judge asked Morillon, “Are you saying, then, General, that what happened in 1995 was a direct reaction to what Naser Oric did to the Serbs two years before?”
And the witness answered, “Yes. Yes, Your Honour. I am convinced of that.”
According to the Dutch Battalion’s report, the Bosnian-Serb military units surrounding Srebrenica in 1995 “were manned chiefly by Bosnian-Serb refugees who had formerly lived in the enclave.”[10]
The soldiers who ultimately perpetrated the July 1995 massacre had been victimized themselves beforehand.
Because Gen. Morillon knew what would happen if the Bosnian-Serbs entered Srebrenica, he tried to have the civilian population evacuated to safety, but he was prevented from doing that by the Bosnian-Muslim authorities.
On April 19, 1993– two years before the massacre – Reuters and the New York Times reported that:
“Authorities in Srebrenica refused today to allow civilians to be evacuated from the besieged Muslim town, a United Nations official said. “‘We have just received confirmation that the Bosnian authorities in Srebrenica will not permit any evacuation’, a UN High Commissioner for Refugees spokeswoman said in Belgrade. “She said the Muslim authorities didn’t give a reason for blocking the operation.”[11] During his testimony Morillon noted that “Had I been able to evacuate all those who had wanted me to do so at the time that I intervened in Srebrenica, we could certainly have saved a number of human lives.”
He said, “the Bosniaks used the presence of their population to keep the attention of the world focused on their situation, they prevented the evacuation from Srebrenica …the authorities of Izetbegovic were the ones who stood up against the evacuation of those towards Tuzla for all those who wanted to, and there were many of them who wanted to.”[12]
Concurrent with Morillon’s failed efforts to evacuate the civilian population from Srebrenica, the Security Council designated it a “UN Safe Area” in April 1993.
As a so-called “Safe area”, Srebrenica was supposed to be demilitarized. On May 8[SUP]th[/SUP] 1993 Ratko Mladic on behalf of the Serbs, and Sefer Halilovic on behalf of the Muslims, signed an agreement on the demilitarization of Srebrenica in the presence of Gen. Morillon.[13]
Under the terms of the agreement, all of the weapons in the enclave were to be placed under the control of the UN; in turn the UN was responsible for the security of the enclave. That was how things were on paper, but real life was different.
The Muslims did not demilitarize Srebrenica; instead they used the so-called “safe area” as a base from which to attack the Bosnian-Serb army and the surrounding Serbian villages.
Two weeks before the enclave fell, Muslim troops from Srebrenica attacked an undefended Serbian village. At 4:30 AM on June 26, 1995 they attacked the hamlet of Visnjica near Srebrenica, burning houses, killing livestock, and sending Serb civilians fleeing for their lives.[14]
Conspiracies seldom remain secret, and Srebrenica is no exception. Although the Western news media refuses to discuss the role played by anyone other than the Serbs, some Bosnian-Muslim officials have spoken out.
Ibran Mustafic was a founding member of Alija Izetbegovic’s political party, a member of the Bosnian parliament, and a resident of Srebrenica. In 1996 he told Sarajevo’s Slobodna Bosna newspaper that “The betrayal of Srebrenica was consciously prepared. Unfortunately, the Bosnian presidency and the Army command were involved in this business; if you want the names, figure it out yourself. I understood the situation in Srebrenica and, you can trust me on this, had I not been prevented by a group of criminals, many more inhabitants of Srebrenica would be alive today. Had I received an order to attack the Serb army from the demilitarized zone, I would have rejected to carry out that order without thinking and would have asked the person who had issued that order to bring his family to Srebrenica so that I can give him a gun and let him stage attacks from the demilitarized zone. I knew that such shameful, calculated moves were leading my people to a catastrophe.”[15]
At least 1,000 Bosnian Muslims from Srebrenica were killed by their compatriots during the breakthrough to Tuzla in July 1995, because there were lists of those who ” have to be prevented from reaching the freedom,at any cost”, – Ibran Mustafic, Planirani haos (The Planned Chaos)
The Motive to Betray One’s Own People
In 1998, Srebrenica’s wartime chief of police, Hakija Meholjic told the Sarajevo newspaper Dani that in September 1993 Izetbegovic told him: “You know, I was offered by [Bill] Clinton in April that the [Serbian] Chetnik forces enter Srebrenica, carry out a slaughter of 5,000 Muslims, and then there will be a [NATO] military intervention.”[16]
Meholjic’s statement is corroborated by the UN Secretary General’s report on the fall of Srebrenica, which says “Representatives of the Bosniac community gathered in Sarajevo on 28 and 29 September [1993] to vote on the [Invincible] peace package. A delegation of Bosniacs from Srebrenica was transported to Sarajevo by UNPROFOR helicopter to participate in the debate. Prior to the meeting, the delegation met in private with President Izetbegovic, who told them that there were Serb proposals to exchange Srebrenica and Zepa for territories around Sarajevo.
The delegation opposed the idea, and the subject was not discussed further. Some surviving members of the Srebrenica delegation have stated that President Izetbegovic also told them he had learned that a NATO intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovinawas possible, but could only occur if the Serbs were to break into Srebrenica, killing at least 5,000 of its people. President Izetbegovic has flatly denied making such a statement.”[17]
It certainly appears that Alija Izetbegovic incited a massacre against his own people in Srebrenica because he wanted NATO to intervene in the Bosnian war on his behalf.
Izetbegovic’s regime provoked the Serbs by perpetrating massacres against them, blocked the evacuation of the civilian population, staged attacks from the safe area, and when the anticipated Serb retaliation finally came, his regime abandoned Srebrenica with full knowledge of what the consequences would be.
The truth is ugly. The Serbs executed enemy POWs in violation of the Geneva Conventions, the Muslims deliberately goaded them into it for propaganda purposes, the U.N. allowed all of it to happen even though they had the means to stop it, NATO got conned into being the Muslim air force, and Western governments and news media lied about the whole thing. The end result of all of it is that thousands of people died needlessly.
Hollywood as NWO useful idiot: Promoting US imperialism, from Bosnia to Syria, Iraq and Ukraine – actress Angelina Jolie, Srebrenica
Criminal Liability
In 2004, the U.N. War Crimes Tribunal inThe Hague convicted Bosnian-Serb general Radislav Krstic of aiding and abetting “genocide” (sic) in Srebrenica and sentenced him to 35 years in prison.
Krstic did not participate in, order, or even know the massacre was happening. In fact, Krstic specifically ordered that no harm was to befall the Bosnian Muslim civilians.[18]
The Tribunal ruled that “It was unnecessary for the Trial Chamber to conclude that Radislav Krstic was actually aware that those other criminal acts were being committed; it was sufficient that their occurrence was foreseeable to him and that those other crimes did in fact occur.”[19]
War criminal Bill Clinton participates in Srebrenica sharade
The Srebrenica massacre was foreseeable to the Bosnian-Muslim authorities and to the U.N. as well. They too had the ability and the obligation to prevent the massacre, and they didn’t do it either. One has to wonder about the integrity of the judicial process surrounding Srebrenica, when someone like Krstic is held responsible and they’re not.
One also has to wonder whether a conflict of interest arises when a UN Tribunal conducts the investigations, makes factual findings, and determines criminal liability with regard to events where the UN was as deeply involved as it was in Srebrenica. The UN’s failure to demilitarize the enclave or prevent its collapse and subsequent massacre, when it had the ability to do so, certainly begs the question of whether those failures were
Srebrenica wurde als Voelkermord eingestuft, leugnet diesen, Milosevic mehr oder weniger als Helden gegen den Westen bezeichnet und Mladic auch noch in Schutz genommen. Respektable Leistung.
Und hier nochmals, Clinton und der Rest der Welt ist Schuld, nur nicht jene die wirklich dafuer verantwortlich sind. Kennen wir ja auch aus dem Ukraine-Thema
Hier ein kleines Stück Wahrheit. Nich alle auf einmal schnell runterschlucken.....polako
[h=1]Washingtons Völkermörder in Srebrenica gefeiert[/h] © AFP 2017/ Elvis Barukcic
Meinungen08:24 14.07.2015(aktualisiert 16:12 05.10.2015) Zum Kurzlink
Rüdiger Göbel
29766615413
[h=2]Zur Gedenkveranstaltung im bosnischen Srebrenica wurden ausgerechnet der frühere US-Präsident Bill Clinton und seine damalige Außenministerin Madeleine Albright als Ehrengäste geladen. Die aus Washington eingeflogenen Politpromis sind für den Tod Hunderttausender Muslime verantwortlich – und keiner regt sich darüber auf.[/h]In Srebrenica beweinen sie ihre Söhne, ihre Männer, ihre Väter – all denen, die vor 20 Jahren in der UN-Schutzzone in Bosnien-Herzegowina ihre Liebsten im Krieg verloren haben, ist Trauer und Leid in diesen Julitagen nicht abzusprechen. Sie gehen zur Gedenkstätte, legen Blumen an den weißen Stelen nieder. Mehr als 6.000 Tote sind in dem weiten Gräberfeld in den vergangenen zwei Jahrzehnten beigesetzt worden.
© REUTERS/ Stoyan Nenov TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY
Balkan-Expertin: Srebrenica war kein Völkermord
Mehr als 50.000 Menschen haben sich auf dem Friedhof im Osten Bosniens versammelt, fast 90 Delegationen aus dem Ausland und mehr als 800 Journalisten waren gekommen, an das »schlimmste Verbrechen in Europa seit Ende des Zweiten Krieges« zu erinnern. Die bosnisch-serbische Armee unter General Ratko Mladic wird verantwortlich gemacht, nach dem Einmarsch in die Stadt Srebrenica am 11. Juli 1995 an leichtbewaffneten niederländischen Blauhelmsoldaten vorbei rund 8000 Muslime getötet zu haben. Das US-amerikanische Repräsentantenhaus hat das Vorgehen der Serben gerade als »Völkermord« gebrandmarkt. Um auch ganz sicher verstanden zu werden, kommt in dem zum 20. Jahrestag beschlossenen Resolutionstext der Begriff »Genozid« insgesamt 14 Mal vor. Kritisiert wird außerdem die »Leugnung oder ein Anzweifeln, dass das Massaker in Srebrenica ein Genozid war«. Auch das EU-Parlament verurteilte die serbischen Verbrechen von Srebrenica als »Völkermord«.
Im UN-Sicherheitsrat verhinderte Russland eine vom NATO-Mitglied Großbritannien eingebrachte »Völkermord«-Resolution mit einem Veto. Der Entwurf habe allein die bosnischen Serben für Kriegsverbrechen verantwortlich gemacht, argumentierte der Vertreter Moskaus. Das erschwere die Versöhnung auf dem Balkan.
© AP Photo/ Amel Emric
Tragödie in Srebrenica: Kerry will Schuldige bestraft sehen
Es war der einzige Hinweis darauf, dass im bosnischen Bürgerkrieg von 1992 bis 1995 nicht nur Muslime gestorben sind. Rund um Srebrenica etwa trauern Serben um ihre Liebsten, die von muslimischen Verbänden aus der UN-Schutzzone heraus unter dem Kommando Naser Orics massakriert wurden. Die Witwen und Waisen dort weinen an den Gräbern in aller Stille, ohne dass sich die Weltpresse und die Weltpolitik darum kümmern. In der bosnischen Hauptstadt Sarajewo wird Oric auf Plakaten als »Unser Held« gefeiert. Als Gipfel der Heuchelei muss aber der Auftritt des früheren US-Präsidenten Bill Clinton bei der großen Srebrenica-Show gelten. Er war in Begleitung seiner damaligen Außenministerin Madeleine Albright gekommen und hatte in seiner Rede bei den Angehörigen der Toten von Srebrenica – der muslimischen allein – um Entschuldigung gebeten. »Es tue ihm leid, dass es zu lange gedauert habe, bis man endlich einen Frieden in Bosnien habe vermitteln können«, gab die FAZ seine Ausführungen wider.
Nun ja, der Frieden in Bosnien wurde von Clinton, damals als US-Präsident auch Oberkommandierender der amerikanischen Truppen, »vermittelt« durch vierzehntägige Luftangriffe auf serbische Stellungen. Diese erlaubten es den verbündeten kroatischen und muslimischen Truppen, bis zu 70 Prozent von Bosnien-Herzegowina zu erobern. Am Ende standen ein in Dayton ausgehandelter Friedensvertrag und eine faktische Zweiteilung des Balkanlandes bis heute.
© REUTERS/ Dado Ruvic
Außenpolitiker: Serben danken Russland für Veto gegen Srebrenica-Resolution
Zu den Verbrechen der Verbündeten – dazu gehört auch die Vertreibung von mehr als 200.000 Serben aus der Krajina durch die kroatische Armee im Sommer 1995 – schweigt Washington wohlweislich. Bis heute. Nachgerade pervers ist es aber, wenn die USA zur Erinnerung an den »Völkermord« von Srebrenica mit Clinton und Albright zwei Politiker schicken, die ein Vielfaches an Toten zu verantworten haben.
William Jefferson »Bill« Clinton war von 1993 bis 2001 der 42. Präsident der Vereinigten Staaten. Davon profitiert er bis heute. Redeauftritte lässt sich der Demokrat mit 100.000 bis 350.000 US-Dollar bezahlen – wie viel er für seinen Trip nach Srebrenica bekommen hat, ist nicht überliefert.
Praktisch jeder assoziiert mit Clintons Amtszeit die Sexaffäre mit einer Praktikantin, nicht aber die Verantwortung für den Tod von Hunderttausenden Kindern im Irak infolge umfassender Wirtschaftssanktionen. Die Blockade war ursprünglich im August 1990 – George Bush sen. war seinerzeit US-Präsident – nach dem Einmarsch irakischer Truppen im Nachbarland Kuwait vom UN-Sicherheitsrat verhängt und dann Jahr um Jahr vor allem auf Betreiben Washingtons verlängert worden.
© AP Photo/ Sulejman Omerbasic
Streit um Srebrenica-Resolution: Scheitern Serbiens Bemühungen um EU-Beitritt?
Clinton ist maßgeblich für die humanitäre Katastrophe im Zweistromland in den 1990er Jahren verantwortlich. UNICEF, das Kinderhilfswerk der Vereinten Nationen, verwies 1999 in Studien darauf, dass die Sterblichkeit von unter Fünfjährigen in der Zeit des Embargos dramatisch erhöht hatte. »Hätte die erhebliche Abnahme der Kindersterblichkeit in den 80er in den 90er Jahren angehalten, so wären insgesamt eine halbe Million weniger Todesfälle in den acht Jahren von 1991 bis 1998 bei Kindern unter fünf Jahren zu verzeichnen gewesen«, so die UNICEF-Direktorin Carol Bellamy. Laut Richard Garfield, Professor für öffentliches Gesundheitswesen an der Columbia University, hat die Zunahme der Kindersterblichkeit zwischen 1991 und 2002 zum Tod von 345.000 bis 530.000 Kindern im Irak geführt. Tim Dyson, Professor für Bevölkerungswissenschaften an der London School of Economics, geht davon aus, dass zwischen 1990 und 2003 etwa 660.000 bis 880.000 irakische Kinder unter fünf Jahren gestorben sind. Für ältere Kinder liegen keine Zahlen vor.
Clinton wusste seinerzeit, was er tat. Der Irak durfte auf sein Betreiben hin zeitweise selbst Milchpulver, Impfstoffe und andere wichtige Medikamenten nicht importieren. Die Folgen des Embargos waren bekannt. Mehrere UN-Organisationen schilderten den wirtschaftlichen Zusammenbruch im Irak und das Leid der Bevölkerung. Die Berichte gingen jeweils an die verantwortlichen Regierungen – allen voran die in Washington und in London. Zwei Leiter des UN-Hilfsprogramms für Irak legten aus Protest gegen die brutale Blockadepolitik ihr Amt nieder, 1998 Denis Halliday, im Jahr 2000 der deutsche Hans von Sponeck. Die jahrelangen Sanktionen nannten sie eine »Völkermord-Aktion«.
© Sputnik/ Alexei Druschienin
Serbiens Präsident dankt Moskau für Veto gegen UN-Resolution zu Srebrenica
Vor fünf Jahren schrieb der Journalist Michael Holmes in einem bemerkenswerten Meinungsbeitrag (»Der vergessene Krieg gegen Iraks Zivilbevölkerung«, 22. September 2010) in der Springer-Zeitung Die Welt: »Die Verhängung eines solch drakonischen Embargos hätte man als einen tragischen Fehler abtun können, wäre es rechtzeitig wieder beendet worden. Dessen jahrelange Fortsetzung war ein ungeheuerliches Verbrechen – vielleicht das schlimmste, das westliche Demokratien in den letzten Jahrzehnten verübt haben. Dennoch musste sich keiner der verantwortlichen Politiker jemals vor einer Untersuchungskommission oder einem Gericht verantworten. Die Menschen im Irak erhielten bis heute keine Entschuldigung. Kein Denkmal erinnert an die Toten.« Daran hat sich bis heute nichts geändert. Internationale Strafgerichtstribunale bleiben Serben und Afrikanern vorbehalten.
Clintons Begleiterin in Srebrenica, Madeleine Albright, hatte während eines Fernsehinterviews auf die Frage, ob das US-amerikanische Embargo gegen den Irak, das eine halbe Million irakischer Kinder das Leben gekostet hat, diesen Preis wert gewesen sei, geantwortet: »Es ist diesen Preis wert.« In ihrer Autobiografie sprach sie später von einem »politischen Fehler« – in Bezug auf die Antwort im TV, nicht auf die Irak-Sanktionen. In Srebrenica wurde Madame Albright – wie ihr Präsident – als »Ehrengast« empfangen. Nicht einer der 800 akkreditieren Journalisten hat auf diesen Skandal hingewiesen.
Natuerlich mit Zitaten aus Fake-News Seiten.
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
