Du erzählst Mist, schau mal:
-The appellation "former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"
was purely a provisional term to be used only until the dispute was resolved.[23]
-
The term was a reference, not a name; as a neutral party in the dispute,
the United Nations had not sought to determine the name of the state.[23] The President of the Security Council subsequently issued a statement declaring on behalf of the Council that the term "merely reflected the historic fact that it had been in the past a republic of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia."[17] The purpose of the term was also emphasised by the fact that the expression begins with the uncapitalised words "the former Yugoslav", acting as a descriptive term, rather than "the Former Yugoslav", which would act as a proper noun.[23] By also being a reference rather than a name, it met Greek concerns that the term "Macedonia" should not be used in the republic's internationally recognised name.
-The use of the term was purely "
for all purposes within the United Nations"; it was not being mandated for any other party.[23]
-The term did not imply that the Republic of Macedonia had any connection with the existing Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, as opposed to the historical and now-defunct Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.[17]
Quelle: Jochen Abr. Frowein, Rüdiger Wolfrum, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 1997, p. 239. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1998.
