Sonne-2012
Top-Poster
Bitte beim Thema bleiben hier geht es um das Progrom von Instanbul begangen durch einige türkische Nationalisten mit Hilfe der damaligen Regierung
-
Herzlich Willkommen im Balkanforum
Sind Sie neu hier? Dann werden Sie Mitglied in unserer Community.
Bitte hier registrieren
Das Progrom der Türken in Instanbul
- Ersteller Sonne-2012
- Erstellt am
Bitte beim Thema bleiben hier geht es um das Progrom von Instanbul begangen durch einige türkische Nationalisten mit Hilfe der damaligen Regierung
blacksea
Kuzeyin Uşağı
Achso sagt das doch gleich und ich hab gedacht hier geht es um Istanbul.
PS: das heißt Pogrom und nicht Progrom, mehr Respekt bitte und sei nicht unverschämt.
Sonne-2012
Top-Poster
Du solltest von den Opfern mehr Respekt zeigen, kannst du auch etwas zum Thema beitragen?
N
Nik
Guest
Kann ein Moderator Sonne-2012 nicht sperren? Ich dachte, Spam und Hetze sind hier verboten.
blacksea
Kuzeyin Uşağı
Sei ja nicht unverschämt.
Sonne-2012
Top-Poster
While the rioters were not instructed to kill their targets,[SUP][citation needed][/SUP] sections of the mob went much further than scaring or intimidating local Greeks. Between 13 and 16 Greeks and one Armenian (including two clerics) died as a result of the pogrom. However, a number of deaths were never recorded due to the general chaos and according to a number of sources the total death toll is estimated to be at least 30.[SUP][1][/SUP][SUP][31][/SUP] Apart from the from thirty identified victims, an additional of three unidentified bodies were found inside the shops, while three burned bodies were found in a sack in the region of Besiktas.[SUP][31][/SUP]Moreover, 32 Greeks were severely wounded. Men and women were raped and islamized by force, and according to accounts including those of the Turkish writer Aziz Nesin, men, including a priest, were subjected to forced circumcision by members of the mob.[SUP][2][/SUP] Moreover an Armenian rite Christian priest died after the procedure.[SUP][citation needed][/SUP] Priests were also scalped and burnt in their beds and Greek women raped.[SUP][2][/SUP][SUP][33][/SUP][SUP][34][/SUP]Nesin wrote:
A man who was fearful of being beaten, lynched or cut into pieces would imply and try to prove that he was both a Turk and a Muslim. "Pull it out and let us see," they would reply. The poor man would peel off his trousers and show his "Muslimness" and "Turkishness": And what was the proof? That he had been circumcised. If the man was circumcised, he was saved. If not, he was doomed. Indeed, having lied, he could not be saved from a beating. For one of those aggressive young men would draw his knife and circumcise him in the middle of the street and amid the chaos. A difference of two or three centimetres does not justify such a commotion. That night, many men shouting and screaming were Islamized forcefully by the cruel knife. Among those circumcised there was also a priest.[SUP][35]
Istanbul pogrom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[/SUP]
A man who was fearful of being beaten, lynched or cut into pieces would imply and try to prove that he was both a Turk and a Muslim. "Pull it out and let us see," they would reply. The poor man would peel off his trousers and show his "Muslimness" and "Turkishness": And what was the proof? That he had been circumcised. If the man was circumcised, he was saved. If not, he was doomed. Indeed, having lied, he could not be saved from a beating. For one of those aggressive young men would draw his knife and circumcise him in the middle of the street and amid the chaos. A difference of two or three centimetres does not justify such a commotion. That night, many men shouting and screaming were Islamized forcefully by the cruel knife. Among those circumcised there was also a priest.[SUP][35]
Istanbul pogrom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[/SUP]
Sonne-2012
Top-Poster
Weitere Quelle das Progrom begangen durch die damalige Türkei
[h=2]The Istanbul Pogrom of 6–7 September 1955 in the Light of International Law[/h]
[h=5]Authors[/h]Alfred de Zayas
[SUP]1[/SUP]Geneva School of Diplomacy
[h=2]Abstract[/h]The Istanbul pogrom (sometimes referred to as Septemvriana ) was a government-instigated series of riots against the Greek minority of Istanbul in September 1955. It can be characterized as a “crime against humanity,” comparable in scope to the November 1938 Kristallnacht in Germany, perpetrated by the Nazi authorities against Jewish civilians. The Septemvriana satisfies the criteria of article 2 of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (UNCG) because the “intent to destroy in whole or in part” the Greek minority in Istanbul was demonstrably present, the pogrom having been orchestrated by the government of Turkish Prime Minister Adnan Menderes.
Even if the number of deaths (estimated at thirty-seven) among members of the Greek community was relatively low, the result of the pogrom was the flight and emigration of the Greek minority of Istanbul, which once numbered some 100,000 and was subsequently reduced to a few thousand. The vast destruction of Greek property, businesses, and churches provides evidence of the Turkish authorities’ intent to terrorize the Greeks in Istanbul into abandoning the territory, thus eliminating the Greek minority. This practice falls within the ambit of the crime of “ethnic cleansing,” which the UN General Assembly and the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia have interpreted as constituting a form of genocide. Turkey has been a party to the UNCG since 1950. Although it is not a party to the 1968 Convention on the Non-applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity, modern international law imposes the principle of non-prescription to genocide and crimes against humanity.
Accordingly, the obligation to punish the guilty and the responsibility of Turkey to make reparations to the victims and their survivors have not lapsed. Seen in isolation, the Istanbul pogrom can be considered a grave crime under both Turkish domestic law and international law. In the historical context of a religion-driven eliminationist process accompanied by many pogroms before, during, and after World War I within the territories of the Ottoman Empire,
including the destruction of the Greek communities of Pontos and Asia Minor and the atrocities against the Greeks of Smyrna in September 1922, the genocidal character of the Istanbul pogrom becomes apparent. It should be noted, however, that whereas the characterization of theSeptemvriana as a form of genocide lends it greater emotional impact, the legal consequences are essentially the same whether the pogrom is classified under the rubric of genocide or as a crime against humanity.
The Istanbul Pogrom of 6?7 September 1955 in the Light of International Law - Genocide Studies and Prevention - Volume 2, Number 2 / August 2007 - University of Toronto Press
[h=2]The Istanbul Pogrom of 6–7 September 1955 in the Light of International Law[/h]
[h=5]Authors[/h]Alfred de Zayas
[SUP]1[/SUP]Geneva School of Diplomacy
[h=2]Abstract[/h]The Istanbul pogrom (sometimes referred to as Septemvriana ) was a government-instigated series of riots against the Greek minority of Istanbul in September 1955. It can be characterized as a “crime against humanity,” comparable in scope to the November 1938 Kristallnacht in Germany, perpetrated by the Nazi authorities against Jewish civilians. The Septemvriana satisfies the criteria of article 2 of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (UNCG) because the “intent to destroy in whole or in part” the Greek minority in Istanbul was demonstrably present, the pogrom having been orchestrated by the government of Turkish Prime Minister Adnan Menderes.
Even if the number of deaths (estimated at thirty-seven) among members of the Greek community was relatively low, the result of the pogrom was the flight and emigration of the Greek minority of Istanbul, which once numbered some 100,000 and was subsequently reduced to a few thousand. The vast destruction of Greek property, businesses, and churches provides evidence of the Turkish authorities’ intent to terrorize the Greeks in Istanbul into abandoning the territory, thus eliminating the Greek minority. This practice falls within the ambit of the crime of “ethnic cleansing,” which the UN General Assembly and the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia have interpreted as constituting a form of genocide. Turkey has been a party to the UNCG since 1950. Although it is not a party to the 1968 Convention on the Non-applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity, modern international law imposes the principle of non-prescription to genocide and crimes against humanity.
Accordingly, the obligation to punish the guilty and the responsibility of Turkey to make reparations to the victims and their survivors have not lapsed. Seen in isolation, the Istanbul pogrom can be considered a grave crime under both Turkish domestic law and international law. In the historical context of a religion-driven eliminationist process accompanied by many pogroms before, during, and after World War I within the territories of the Ottoman Empire,
including the destruction of the Greek communities of Pontos and Asia Minor and the atrocities against the Greeks of Smyrna in September 1922, the genocidal character of the Istanbul pogrom becomes apparent. It should be noted, however, that whereas the characterization of theSeptemvriana as a form of genocide lends it greater emotional impact, the legal consequences are essentially the same whether the pogrom is classified under the rubric of genocide or as a crime against humanity.
The Istanbul Pogrom of 6?7 September 1955 in the Light of International Law - Genocide Studies and Prevention - Volume 2, Number 2 / August 2007 - University of Toronto Press
Pogrome und Staatsgewalt an den Türken in Bulgarien.Verbot von Türkischen Namen,Verbot der Kultur,Mißhandlungen,verschleppte türken,ermorderte Türken,Weggenommene Kinder,verbot der Beschneidung ,verbot der Religion,enteignungen von Türken,vertreibungen von Türken,mein Vater wurde vertrieben,sein großer Bruder getötet...
Eine Schande für Bulgarien und trotzdem sind diese in der EU...
Immer die Bösen Türken,alle haben gelitten unter den Türken.
G
Gelöschtes Mitglied 12569
Guest
Ja schade nur das die Türkei dadurch den Vertrag von Lausanne gebrochen hat gele .